Arguing that A>C because A beats B and B beats C isn't usually the way to go. Normal Superman is stronger than Silver Surfer and Sentry. Then it wouldn't apply. just posting these here if someone wants to compare feats, i am not going to say anything because i don't know anything, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the whowouldwin community. But if C has other traits that can beat A that B lacks, then the transitive property has no use. Otherwise, standard arena rules, that is, no pis, bloodlust on, you know the rest. Although I would like to say that surfer is almost definitely faster than superman. Once you get to the higher powered characters it becomes harder to use the transitive property because people have more diverse power sets. tl;dr Surfer drains Superman for an easy win. And matter manipulation is much more powerful than heat vision or freeze breath, http://www.reddit.com/r/whowouldwin/comments/2ebg1f/superman_vs_silver_surfer/. You can argue that Surfer is a bit stronger, or Superman is a bit faster, or one of them is more durable, but if they were to slug it out without additional powers, it would be a long, arduous, and bloodly battle that could potentially go on for days. Carnage can beat SS, so carnage can beat Superman! So it's not really a matter of Surfer beats Superman re: Thanos, even though he almost certainly does. this is a much better fight raiden." He's done the same to the Hulk and his gamma energy in most of their encounters. He simply has the perfect powerset to deal with Superman. Does that mean Captain Planet has a good shot against the Hulk because he can clean up radiation? Overall I agree, avoiding it is best. So, pure strength, speed, skill, durability as expressed in the brawl. Does A beat B because of a specific weakness of B or strength of A that wouldn't be relevant against C? But it's perfectly fine when saying A would beat B no problem, and B beats C no problem, so A would beat C double-no problem. Hmm, if that's the argument as to why SS beats Superman, then it's a poor argument to use Surfer to determine if Superman can beat someone else. You might be surprised to know that we don't just accept it. If you love to imagine the planet-exploding battles of the fictional gods who will never be, taking pointless knowledge gathered from a life spent reading and gaming and swinging it like a gladiator's sword in discussions on reddit... then welcome home, my friend. I think it only works so long as the we're talking about whatever characteristics are able to take those characters down. You are indeed where you belong. Generally, the agreement is that Surfer is maybe a bit stronger and faster than Superman, but he also has a really versatile powerset that allows him to destroy Superman. Only. It works in some cases, burin others it doesn't. It's not a bad thing, since it's good to always display that it's been proven via coherent arguments and not just popular assumption. * Introduction -The battle can go either way… Truthfully, at first glance, one might decide that Surfer would easily destroy Superman. This is a bareknuckled fistfight only. Absorbing Superman of his energy is a perfectly safe way of putting Superman down without killing him.

Northern Region Districts Map, How To Boil Egg Yolk Only, I Love It When We're Dancin Down The Hallway, Spinach Meaning In Urdu, Rags O Leary, Turkey Spinach Meatballs No Breadcrumbs, Caffeine Withdrawal Brain Fog Reddit, Unsweetened Pure Cranberry Juice, Best Indica Strains 2020,